Posts tagged Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania Federal Court Holds Notice of Intent to File Third-Party Complaint Constitutes a “Claim”
Pennsylvania Federal Court Holds Notice of Intent to File Third-Party Complaint Constitutes a “Claim”
Third Circuit: Changes in Exposure Provision Bars Coverage for Pre-Merger Liabilities  
Third Circuit: Changes in Exposure Provision Bars Coverage for Pre-Merger Liabilities  
Contract Exclusion Not Applicable Based on Asset Management Services Carveout
Contract Exclusion Not Applicable Based on Asset Management Services Carveout
No Coverage for Wrongful Acts of Acquired Company Occurring Before Purchase
No Coverage for Wrongful Acts of Acquired Company Occurring Before Purchase
Personnel Policies Exclusion Bars Coverage for Negligence Action Arising from Alleged Sexual Harassment and Assault of Insured’s Employee
Personnel Policies Exclusion Bars Coverage for Negligence Action Arising from Alleged Sexual Harassment and Assault of Insured’s Employee
Wage and Hour Violation Exclusion Applies to Allegations of Untimely Payments in Connection with Scheme to Underpay Employees
Wage and Hour Violation Exclusion Applies to Allegations of Untimely Payments in Connection with Scheme to Underpay Employees
Insurer Must Show that Reasonable Insured Would Have Concluded that Potential Claim Could Arise from Ongoing Investigation in Order to Apply Prior Knowledge Exclusion
Insurer Must Show that Reasonable Insured Would Have Concluded that Potential Claim Could Arise from Ongoing Investigation in Order to Apply Prior Knowledge Exclusion
Multiple Claims Against Insured Related to COVID-19 Outbreak Constitute Separate Claims
Multiple Claims Against Insured Related to COVID-19 Outbreak Constitute Separate Claims
No Coverage Under Claims-Made Policy Where No 'Claim' Made Against Insured During Policy Period
No Coverage Under Claims-Made Policy Where No 'Claim' Made Against Insured During Policy Period
No Coverage Under Legal Malpractice Policy for Solo Practitioner’s Family Disputes
No Coverage Under Legal Malpractice Policy for Solo Practitioner’s Family Disputes
Insurer Estopped from Denying Coverage for Legal Malpractice Action But Not Subsequent Disgorgement Action
Insurer Estopped from Denying Coverage for Legal Malpractice Action But Not Subsequent Disgorgement Action
No Coverage for Lawsuit Alleging Human Trafficking and Wage and Hour Violations
No Coverage for Lawsuit Alleging Human Trafficking and Wage and Hour Violations
Insurer Required to Defend Until “Satisfaction” of Covered Verdict
Insurer Required to Defend Until “Satisfaction” of Covered Verdict
Wire Fraud and Money Laundering Can Be “Professional Services” Triggering Criminal Acts Exclusion
Wire Fraud and Money Laundering Can Be “Professional Services” Triggering Criminal Acts Exclusion
Issues of Fact Halt Insurer’s Attempt to Rescind Malpractice Policy
Issues of Fact Halt Insurer’s Attempt to Rescind Malpractice Policy
Claims Alleging Same Conduct Against Same Insured But Based on Different Specific Facts Not Related Under D&O Policy
Claims Alleging Same Conduct Against Same Insured But Based on Different Specific Facts Not Related Under D&O Policy
Outside Business Exclusion Bars Coverage for Claims Indirectly Related to Outside Business
Insured’s Subjective Belief Regarding Likelihood of Being Sued Irrelevant to Prior Knowledge Analysis Under Pennsylvania Law
No Coverage for Malpractice Suit Implicating Policy’s Outside Business Exclusion
Failure of Insured to Provide Timely Notice Under Claims-Made Policy Bars Suit Against Insurer of Bankrupt Insured
Letter Outlining Objections to Excessive Legal Fees Constitutes “Claim”
No Coverage Available Under Crime Policy for Losses Not Discovered “During the Policy Period”
Former Director Not Covered for Wrongful Acts Committed in Uninsured Capacity
No Duty to Defend Claim Seeking Return of Premiums Based on Policy Exclusion
No Coverage Available for Lawsuit Served on Insured after End of Extended Reporting Period
“Reasonable Expectations” Doctrine Inapplicable Due to Unambiguous Effective and Retroactive Dates
Insufficient Notice of Potential Claim Held to Bar Coverage
One Lawsuit Equals One Claim, Regardless of the Number of Causes of Action
Non-Specific Notice of Potential Claim Insufficient Under Claims-Made Policy
Claim for Trademark-Infringing Telephone Scam Not Interrelated with Claim for Internet Scam
Court Holds Insurer Can Allocate Settlements
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek