Posts tagged Loss.
California Federal Court Holds Coverage Barred By Prior Notice Exclusion and Related Claims Provision
California Federal Court Holds Coverage Barred By Prior Notice Exclusion and Related Claims Provision
Costs to Respond to Third-Party Subpoena Do Not Constitute a Claim
Costs to Respond to Third-Party Subpoena Do Not Constitute a Claim
Connecticut Court Holds Restitutionary Settlement Not Insurable Loss
Connecticut Court Holds Restitutionary Settlement Not Insurable Loss
Georgia Federal Court Determines State Court Judgment Entered After Parties Executed a General Release Is Not “Loss”
Georgia Federal Court Determines State Court Judgment Entered After Parties Executed a General Release Is Not “Loss”
Insured Not Entitled to a Windfall Under Cyber Policy’s Business Interruption Insuring Agreement
Insured Not Entitled to a Windfall Under Cyber Policy’s Business Interruption Insuring Agreement
Threat of Bad Faith Does Not Constitute a “Claim” Under Insurance Company’s Professional Liability Policy
Threat of Bad Faith Does Not Constitute a “Claim” Under Insurance Company’s Professional Liability Policy
No E&O Coverage for Settlement of Illinois State Governmental Investigation
No E&O Coverage for Settlement of Illinois State Governmental Investigation
Bump-Up Provision Bars Coverage for Settlement of Post-Merger Claims by Shareholders of Target Company
Bump-Up Provision Bars Coverage for Settlement of Post-Merger Claims by Shareholders of Target Company
California SPAC Entitled to Advancement of Subpoena-Related Costs Post-Name Change Based on “Potentially Covered” Standard
California SPAC Entitled to Advancement of Subpoena-Related Costs Post-Name Change Based on “Potentially Covered” Standard
California Insurance Code Section 533 Does Not Necessarily Bar Coverage for California Labor Code Retaliation Claims
California Insurance Code Section 533 Does Not Necessarily Bar Coverage for California Labor Code Retaliation Claims
Arbitration Award for Amounts Owed Under Separation Agreement Not Covered Loss
Arbitration Award for Amounts Owed Under Separation Agreement Not Covered Loss
Quiet Title Action Does Not Involve Covered “Loss”
Quiet Title Action Does Not Involve Covered “Loss”
Utah Federal Court Holds That Malpractice Claim “Resulting From” Sanctions on Insured Law Firm Seeks “Damages”
Utah Federal Court Holds That Malpractice Claim “Resulting From” Sanctions on Insured Law Firm Seeks “Damages”
Insured Bank’s Acceptance of Loan Payments Without Good Faith Constitutes Uninsurable Loss 
Insured Bank’s Acceptance of Loan Payments Without Good Faith Constitutes Uninsurable Loss 
Settlement of Merger Objection Litigation is Not Covered “Loss”
Settlement of Merger Objection Litigation is Not Covered “Loss”
Coverage for SXSW Refund Lawsuit Barred by Contract Exclusion
Coverage for SXSW Refund Lawsuit Barred by Contract Exclusion
Over $141 Million in Trading Losses for Illegal Trade Deemed “Direct Financial Loss” for “Malicious Act”
Over $141 Million in Trading Losses for Illegal Trade Deemed “Direct Financial Loss” for “Malicious Act”
Policy Requires Allocation of Defense Costs Based Upon Parties’ Relative Legal Exposure
Policy Requires Allocation of Defense Costs Based Upon Parties’ Relative Legal Exposure
$140 million SEC Disgorgement Payment Not a “Penalty” and Insurable Under New York Law
$140 million SEC Disgorgement Payment Not a “Penalty” and Insurable Under New York Law
Sixth Circuit: No Coverage for Defense Costs Resulting from Qui Tam Action
Sixth Circuit: No Coverage for Defense Costs Resulting from Qui Tam Action
Written Consent Must be in Writing: Insured Breaches Consent Requirement and Loses Coverage
Written Consent Must be in Writing: Insured Breaches Consent Requirement and Loses Coverage
"Inadequate Consideration” Provision Bars Coverage for Securities Fraud Settlements
"Inadequate Consideration” Provision Bars Coverage for Securities Fraud Settlements
Coverage for Suit Arising from Settlement of Previous Litigation Not Barred by Prior and Pending Proceeding Exclusion
Coverage for Suit Arising from Settlement of Previous Litigation Not Barred by Prior and Pending Proceeding Exclusion
Billing Fraud Penalties Do Not Constitute “Damages” Under Professional Liability Policy
Excess Insurer Not Bound by Primary Insurer’s Payment of Uninsurable Disgorgement Settlement
Attorneys’ Fees Awarded Pursuant to Statute Are Not “Damages”
Law Firm’s Dispute Over Contingency Fee Does Not Involve Covered Loss
Negligent Supervision of Funds Exclusion Bars Coverage for Trust Investment Losses
Disgorgement of Profits Realized by Insured’s Customers is a Penalty, Not Insurable Loss
Lawsuit Arising Out of Attorney-Client Fee Dispute Did Not Seek “Damages”
Court Finds Insurer Entitled to Recoupment, Declines to Follow ALI Restatement on the Law of Liability Insurance
Settlement Payments Not Uninsurable Disgorgement Where Not Conclusively Linked To Improperly Acquired Funds
Investigation Seeking Sanctions and Return of Fees Sought No Covered “Damages”
No Coverage Available Under Crime Policy for Losses Not Discovered “During the Policy Period”
Text Messages Sent in Violation of TCPA Held to Implicate Professional Services Coverage
TCPA Statutory Damages Are Uninsurable Penalties Under Colorado Law
Washington Court Finds Coverage for Fraudulently Originated Loans Repurchased by Now-Defunct Bank
No Coverage Available for Employment-Related Claims Under Policy D&O and EPL Coverage Sections
Insurer’s Allegations that Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Are Not Covered Loss Survive Motion to Dismiss
Court Finds Hotel Worker Not “Employee” Under Policy for Theft Loss Coverage
NY Appeals Court Holds FCRA Statutory Damages Are Covered Damages
Settlement of Class Actions for Allegedly Withheld Profits Not Disgorgement
Consent Judgment with Covenant Not to Execute Is Covered Loss
Bank Settlements Returning Overdraft Fees—Including Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fee Awards—Are Not “Damages”
Restitution for Criminal Acts Uninsurable Under Pennsylvania Law
Court Holds Insurer Can Allocate Settlements
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek