By Chiara Tondi Resta on Posted in Exclusions,Notice of ClaimThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, applying Indiana law, has held that a prior litigation and event exclusion bars coverage for a claim that was simultaneously reported to both the current insurer and a prior insurer. Emmis Commc’ns. Corp. v. Illinois Nat’l Ins. Co., 2019 WL 2754188, *1 (7th Cir. July 2,… Continue Reading
By Nathan Lovett on Posted in Prior Knowledge/Warranty Exclusion,Wrongful ActThe United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, applying Indiana law, has revived a coverage dispute over whether a medical malpractice insurer’s professional liability insurer must cover the malpractice insurer’s post-verdict excess settlement of an underlying wrongful death claim, finding that factual questions remain as to whether the malpractice insurer’s refusal to settle… Continue Reading
By on Posted in RescissionThe United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, applying Indiana law, denied an insurer’s motion for summary judgment based on rescission, holding that there was a question of material fact where the insurer did not provide evidence of the amount of claims paid or premiums received for the policies to be rescinded.… Continue Reading
By Karen L. Toto on Posted in ExclusionsApplying Indiana law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that neither a company’s crime policy nor its commercial property policy provided coverage for theft of company property by a consultant who worked for the company. Telamon Corp. v. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co., 2017 WL 942656 (7th Cir. Mar.… Continue Reading
By Margaret Thomas on Posted in Dishonesty Exclusion,Wrongful ActThe Court of Appeals of Indiana, applying Indiana law, has held that an insurer had no duty to defend its insured against a complaint alleging only intentional misconduct where the policy covered only negligent acts, errors and omissions. Mt. Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v. Louis Jancetic, 2016 WL 6584268 (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 4, 2016). … Continue Reading
By Emily S. Hart on Posted in “Claim”The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana has held that coverage under a claims-made-and-reported policy is not illusory where coverage is unavailable for claims that do not satisfy the policy’s claims-made, reporting, and retroactive date requirements. Sunshine v. Gen. Star Nat’l Ins. Co., 2016 WL 5371848 (S.D. Ind. Sept. 26, 2016).… Continue Reading
By Margaret Thomas on Posted in Notice of ClaimApplying Indiana law, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana has held that a policy which insures the same pool of risk and offers professional liability coverage for the insured law firm for professional acts provides “similar coverage” as that term is used in the firm’s previous professional liability policy despite… Continue Reading
