Posts tagged Florida.
Lawsuit not a “Related Claim” to Earlier Demand Letter, but Policy Rescinded Based on Material Misrepresentations in Application
Lawsuit not a “Related Claim” to Earlier Demand Letter, but Policy Rescinded Based on Material Misrepresentations in Application
Promissory Estoppel Claim Allowed to Proceed Against Insurer Based on Reversal in Coverage Position
Promissory Estoppel Claim Allowed to Proceed Against Insurer Based on Reversal in Coverage Position
No Coverage for Claim Involving New Defendants and Alleging New Wrongful Acts Where Claim Relates Back to Earlier Policy Period
No Coverage for Claim Involving New Defendants and Alleging New Wrongful Acts Where Claim Relates Back to Earlier Policy Period
Company’s Misrepresentations Warrant Policy Rescission Under Florida Law
Company’s Misrepresentations Warrant Policy Rescission Under Florida Law
No Coverage Under Claims-Made Policy for Lawsuit Served on Registered Agent Before Policy Period
No Coverage Under Claims-Made Policy for Lawsuit Served on Registered Agent Before Policy Period
Lawsuit Deemed Related to Notice of Circumstances Submitted During Prior Claims-Made Policy Period Under Florida’s “Sufficient Factual Nexus” Test
Lawsuit Deemed Related to Notice of Circumstances Submitted During Prior Claims-Made Policy Period Under Florida’s “Sufficient Factual Nexus” Test
No Coverage for Claim That “Correlates” to Claim Made Before Policy Period
No Coverage for Claim That “Correlates” to Claim Made Before Policy Period
“Theft of Funds” Exclusion Precludes Coverage Where All Underlying Claims “Arose Out of” Theft
“Theft of Funds” Exclusion Precludes Coverage Where All Underlying Claims “Arose Out of” Theft
Related Wrongful Acts Preclude Reinsurer’s Duty to Reimburse
Related Wrongful Acts Preclude Reinsurer’s Duty to Reimburse
No Duty to Defend Lawsuit Alleging Remuneration to which Insured was Not Legally Entitled
No Duty to Defend Lawsuit Alleging Remuneration to which Insured was Not Legally Entitled
Insured’s Failure to Allocate Settlement Between Covered and Uncovered Claims Precludes Recovery
Insured’s Failure to Allocate Settlement Between Covered and Uncovered Claims Precludes Recovery
Duty to Defend Where Complaint Contains Potentially Covered Allegations
Duty to Defend Where Complaint Contains Potentially Covered Allegations
Breach of Contract Exclusion Precludes Duty to Defend Vendor’s Claim Against Travel Agency for Non-Payment
Breach of Contract Exclusion Precludes Duty to Defend Vendor’s Claim Against Travel Agency for Non-Payment
E&O Insurer Has No Duty to Defend Dispute Limited to Recovery of Fees
E&O Insurer Has No Duty to Defend Dispute Limited to Recovery of Fees
Email Expressing Intention to Discuss Settlement Constitutes “Claim”  
Email Expressing Intention to Discuss Settlement Constitutes “Claim”  
Coverage for Negligence Claim Against Law Firm Arising from Wire Fraud Barred by Professional Liability Policy’s “Theft Exclusion”
Coverage for Negligence Claim Against Law Firm Arising from Wire Fraud Barred by Professional Liability Policy’s “Theft Exclusion”
No Coverage for Second Lawsuit Alleging Acts that Correlate to Acts Alleged in Earlier Lawsuit Predating Claims-Made Policy Period
No Coverage for Second Lawsuit Alleging Acts that Correlate to Acts Alleged in Earlier Lawsuit Predating Claims-Made Policy Period
Lawsuit Arising Out of Three Design Errors is a Single “Claim,” and Prior Knowledge and Prior Notice Provisions Bar Coverage
Lawsuit Arising Out of Three Design Errors is a Single “Claim,” and Prior Knowledge and Prior Notice Provisions Bar Coverage
No Coverage for Criminal Investigation Where Claim Was Not Reported During Applicable Notice Period
No Coverage for Receiver’s Claw Back Claim Against D&O Because Profit Exclusion Applied and Claim Did Not Arise Out of a “Wrongful Act”
Fraud Exclusion Bars Coverage for Insured Found in Violation of Federal Securities Laws
Eleventh Circuit Applies Securities Exclusion Broadly
Invasion of Privacy Exclusion Bars Coverage for Consent Judgment in TCPA Claim
Regulatory Warning Notices Asserting Damages Based on Same Acquisition Involve “Related Wrongful Acts”
No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Due to Securities Exclusion
No Personal Injury Coverage for Payment Card Breach Because Damages Resulted from Hacker’s Criminal Conduct, Not Insured’s Data Security Practices
Lawsuits Involving a “Continuing Pattern of Anticompetitive Behavior” Constitute Related Claims
No Coverage for Criminal Investigation Where Sealed Affidavit Identifying Insured as Target of Investigation Was Not Reported During Policy Period
Eleventh Circuit Holds Prior Acts Exclusion Does Not Apply to Claim by FDIC Against Failed Bank
No Indemnification for Insured’s “Restitutionary In Nature” Settlement Payments, Even Without Admission of Guilt or a Final Adjudication
Eleventh Circuit Affirms that Eleven Claims Arising Out Of Negligently Repackaging Two Drugs Are “Related Claims”
Prior Knowledge Exclusion Bars Coverage for Claim Against Insured Attorney
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal Where Professional Services Exclusion Unambiguously Created Joint, Not Several, Obligations
Prior Acts Exclusion Bars Coverage for Claims Arising Out of Actions Predating Policy
Allegations Concerning Wage Fixing in Violation of the Sherman Act Do Not Fall Within Professional Liability Coverage for “Counseling” Services
Florida Statute Does Not Estop Insurer from Denying Reimbursement of Pre-Tender Defense Costs
Eleven Claims Arising Out of Negligently Repackaging Two Drugs Are “Related Claims”
Quality of Services Exclusion Bars Coverage for Online Auction Service’s Alleged Misrepresentations About Its Reliability
Insured’s Settlement Without Regard to Reasonableness Rendered Consent Judgment Unenforceable Against Insurer that Breached Duty to Defend
Statutory Request for Insurance Information Is Not a Claim
Related Claims Provision Does Not Conflict with Prior and Pending Litigation Exclusion
No Double Recovery Under Policy for Amounts Paid by Contractual Indemnitor
Court Limits Discovery in Absence of Bad Faith Claim
Insured v. Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage for Former Director’s Action Against CEO
Dentist’s Alleged Sexual Misconduct Not Covered Under EPL Policy
Podcast: What Insurers Should Know About Bad Faith Claims in Florida
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.