Posts tagged Washington.
Vendor’s Demand for Payment of an Invoice Triggers Duty to Defend Under Washington Law
Vendor’s Demand for Payment of an Invoice Triggers Duty to Defend Under Washington Law
Washington Court Holds Late Notice Bars Coverage Under Claims-Made Policy
Washington Court Holds Late Notice Bars Coverage Under Claims-Made Policy
Washington Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Stipulated Judgment
Washington Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Stipulated Judgment
Settlement Paid to States to Resolve HIPAA and Consumer Protection Law Claims Constitutes Non-Covered “Fines and Penalties”
Settlement Paid to States to Resolve HIPAA and Consumer Protection Law Claims Constitutes Non-Covered “Fines and Penalties”
Insured Versus Insured Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Claims Brought by Member of Insured LLC
Insured Versus Insured Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Claims Brought by Member of Insured LLC
No Coverage for Employment Lawsuit Where Insured Failed to Notice Earlier EEOC Charges
No Coverage for Employment Lawsuit Where Insured Failed to Notice Earlier EEOC Charges
Insurer Has Duty to Defend Lanham Act “False Advertising” Claims Despite False Advertising and Trademark Exclusions
Insurer Has Duty to Defend Lanham Act “False Advertising” Claims Despite False Advertising and Trademark Exclusions
Ninth Circuit Holds Demand Letter and Suit Alleging Same Wrongful Acts Are Not Necessarily a Single Claim Where Policy Lacks Related Claims Provision
Ninth Circuit Holds Demand Letter and Suit Alleging Same Wrongful Acts Are Not Necessarily a Single Claim Where Policy Lacks Related Claims Provision
Interrelated Claims Provision Precludes Coverage for Putative Class Action
Defense Cost Recoupment Provisions Enforceable Under Washington Law
Insurer Must Defend Utility in Suit Based on Outage, Despite Exclusion for Property Damage and Resulting Loss of Use
Exclusion Bars Coverage for Fraudulent Instruction Loss when Employee with Authority to Initiate Wire Transfer Enters Fraudulent Account Information
Washington Court Holds that Statutory Notice of Intent to Sue Letter is Not a “Claim”
Washington Court Finds Coverage for Fraudulently Originated Loans Repurchased by Now-Defunct Bank
Insured’s Failure to Provide Notice of Demand Letter Precludes Coverage for Related Lawsuit Noticed in Subsequent Policy Period
Contract Exclusion Bars Coverage for Suit Alleging Breach of Special Relationship and Conversion
Insurer Did Not Breach Duty to Defend Where it Refused to Defend Insured’s Husband and Marital Community
Environmental Claims Arose from Prior Orders and Deemed Not First Made During Relevant Policy Period
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek