Posts tagged Washington.
Washington Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Stipulated Judgment
Washington Appeals Court Upholds Reasonableness of Stipulated Judgment
Settlement Paid to States to Resolve HIPAA and Consumer Protection Law Claims Constitutes Non-Covered “Fines and Penalties”
Settlement Paid to States to Resolve HIPAA and Consumer Protection Law Claims Constitutes Non-Covered “Fines and Penalties”
Insured Versus Insured Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Claims Brought by Member of Insured LLC
Insured Versus Insured Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Claims Brought by Member of Insured LLC
No Coverage for Employment Lawsuit Where Insured Failed to Notice Earlier EEOC Charges
No Coverage for Employment Lawsuit Where Insured Failed to Notice Earlier EEOC Charges
Insurer Has Duty to Defend Lanham Act “False Advertising” Claims Despite False Advertising and Trademark Exclusions
Insurer Has Duty to Defend Lanham Act “False Advertising” Claims Despite False Advertising and Trademark Exclusions
Ninth Circuit Holds Demand Letter and Suit Alleging Same Wrongful Acts Are Not Necessarily a Single Claim Where Policy Lacks Related Claims Provision
Ninth Circuit Holds Demand Letter and Suit Alleging Same Wrongful Acts Are Not Necessarily a Single Claim Where Policy Lacks Related Claims Provision
Interrelated Claims Provision Precludes Coverage for Putative Class Action
Defense Cost Recoupment Provisions Enforceable Under Washington Law
Insurer Must Defend Utility in Suit Based on Outage, Despite Exclusion for Property Damage and Resulting Loss of Use
Exclusion Bars Coverage for Fraudulent Instruction Loss when Employee with Authority to Initiate Wire Transfer Enters Fraudulent Account Information
Washington Court Holds that Statutory Notice of Intent to Sue Letter is Not a “Claim”
Washington Court Finds Coverage for Fraudulently Originated Loans Repurchased by Now-Defunct Bank
Insured’s Failure to Provide Notice of Demand Letter Precludes Coverage for Related Lawsuit Noticed in Subsequent Policy Period
Contract Exclusion Bars Coverage for Suit Alleging Breach of Special Relationship and Conversion
Insurer Did Not Breach Duty to Defend Where it Refused to Defend Insured’s Husband and Marital Community
Environmental Claims Arose from Prior Orders and Deemed Not First Made During Relevant Policy Period
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.