Posts tagged Related Claims and associated exclusions.
Antitrust and Consumer Protection Laws Exclusions Bar Coverage for Underlying Litigation
Antitrust and Consumer Protection Laws Exclusions Bar Coverage for Underlying Litigation
No Coverage for Claim That “Correlates” to Claim Made Before Policy Period
No Coverage for Claim That “Correlates” to Claim Made Before Policy Period
Insured v. Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage For Entirety of Suit Brought By Insureds and Non-Insureds
Insured v. Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage For Entirety of Suit Brought By Insureds and Non-Insureds
No Duty to Defend When Demand Letter Received Prior to Policy Period
No Duty to Defend When Demand Letter Received Prior to Policy Period
Kansas Federal Court Holds Notice-Prejudice Rule Inapplicable to Claims-Made Policies
Kansas Federal Court Holds Notice-Prejudice Rule Inapplicable to Claims-Made Policies
Insurer Owes Duty to Defend and Indemnify Nuisance Litigation
Insurer Owes Duty to Defend and Indemnify Nuisance Litigation
Ninth Circuit Holds Three Printing Errors Constitute Single Wrongful Act
Ninth Circuit Holds Three Printing Errors Constitute Single Wrongful Act
No Coverage for Second Lawsuit Alleging Acts that Correlate to Acts Alleged in Earlier Lawsuit Predating Claims-Made Policy Period
No Coverage for Second Lawsuit Alleging Acts that Correlate to Acts Alleged in Earlier Lawsuit Predating Claims-Made Policy Period
No Coverage for Wrongful Acts Alleged in Lawsuit Received Prior to Policy Period
No Coverage for Wrongful Acts Alleged in Lawsuit Received Prior to Policy Period
Arbitration Demand Letter Constitutes a Claim Requiring Timely Notice
Arbitration Demand Letter Constitutes a Claim Requiring Timely Notice
Single Lawsuit Comprised of Multiple “Claims”
Single Lawsuit Comprised of Multiple “Claims”
Coverage for Suit Arising from Settlement of Previous Litigation Not Barred by Prior and Pending Proceeding Exclusion
Coverage for Suit Arising from Settlement of Previous Litigation Not Barred by Prior and Pending Proceeding Exclusion
Multiple Lawsuits Arising Out of Employee’s Alleged Sexual Abuse of Multiple Children are “Single Claim” Under Claims-Made Policy
Multiple Lawsuits Arising Out of Employee’s Alleged Sexual Abuse of Multiple Children are “Single Claim” Under Claims-Made Policy
Wrongful Acts Alleged in Class Action Based on Corporate Policy Are Not “Related Acts”
Wrongful Acts Alleged in Class Action Based on Corporate Policy Are Not “Related Acts”
Lawsuits Concerning Same Housing Development Project Are Related Claims
Lawsuits Concerning Same Housing Development Project Are Related Claims
No Coverage for Lawsuit Alleging Same Circumstances Asserted in Email Received Prior to Policy Period
No Coverage for Lawsuit Alleging Same Circumstances Asserted in Email Received Prior to Policy Period
No Coverage for Lawsuit That Related Back to Claim Made During Prior Policy Period
No Coverage for Lawsuit That Related Back to Claim Made During Prior Policy Period
Insured Failed to Timely Report Grievance Letter as 'Professional Claim,' But Insurer’s Late Notice Denial Waived By Seven-Month Delay
Insured Failed to Timely Report Grievance Letter as 'Professional Claim,' But Insurer’s Late Notice Denial Waived By Seven-Month Delay
Prior Acts Exclusion Bars Coverage for Shareholder Suits Based on Failure to Disclose Related-Party Transactions to SEC
Prior Acts Exclusion Bars Coverage for Shareholder Suits Based on Failure to Disclose Related-Party Transactions to SEC
Suits Alleging Anticompetitive Conduct by NCAA Deemed Related
Suits Alleging Anticompetitive Conduct by NCAA Deemed Related
No Coverage for Claim Deemed First Made Prior to Inception of Policy Period
No Coverage for Claim Deemed First Made Prior to Inception of Policy Period
Class Actions Comprising Different Class Periods Causally and Logically Related
Class Actions Comprising Different Class Periods Causally and Logically Related
No Coverage for Judgment Premised on Same Facts Asserted in Suit Filed Prior to Policy Period
No Coverage for Judgment Premised on Same Facts Asserted in Suit Filed Prior to Policy Period
Claims Arising Out of Alleged Sexual Abuse by Doctor are “Related Claims” Subject to Single Limit of Liability Under Sexual Misconduct Endorsement
Claims Arising Out of Alleged Sexual Abuse by Doctor are “Related Claims” Subject to Single Limit of Liability Under Sexual Misconduct Endorsement
SEC Enforcement Action Deemed a Single Claim With Prior SEC Investigation and Shareholder Suits
SEC Enforcement Action Deemed a Single Claim With Prior SEC Investigation and Shareholder Suits
Declaratory Judgment Complaint Constitutes a Reportable Claim for a Wrongful Act; Subsequent Amended Complaint Adding Insured Defendants Not a Separate Claim
Declaratory Judgment Complaint Constitutes a Reportable Claim for a Wrongful Act; Subsequent Amended Complaint Adding Insured Defendants Not a Separate Claim
Ninth Circuit Holds Demand Letter and Suit Alleging Same Wrongful Acts Are Not Necessarily a Single Claim Where Policy Lacks Related Claims Provision
Ninth Circuit Holds Demand Letter and Suit Alleging Same Wrongful Acts Are Not Necessarily a Single Claim Where Policy Lacks Related Claims Provision
Claims Alleging Same Conduct Against Same Insured But Based on Different Specific Facts Not Related Under D&O Policy
Claims Alleging Same Conduct Against Same Insured But Based on Different Specific Facts Not Related Under D&O Policy
Lawsuit Arising Out of Three Design Errors is a Single “Claim,” and Prior Knowledge and Prior Notice Provisions Bar Coverage
Lawsuit Arising Out of Three Design Errors is a Single “Claim,” and Prior Knowledge and Prior Notice Provisions Bar Coverage
Fifth Circuit: Late Notice of First Claim Bars Coverage for Related Claims
Failure to Report EEOC Charge Precludes Coverage for Interrelated Lawsuit
Letter to Insured Asserting Right to Patent Applications Constitutes a Claim Made Prior to D&O Policy Period
Interrelated Claims Provision Precludes Coverage for Putative Class Action
First Circuit Holds UBS Puerto Rico Bond Claims Barred by Specific Litigation Exclusion
Specific Matter Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuits Involving Same Parties as Lawsuit Included in Definition of “Specific Matter”
SEC Investigation Constitutes One Claim; Component Subpoenas Are Not Written Demands for Non-Monetary Relief
Regulatory Warning Notices Asserting Damages Based on Same Acquisition Involve “Related Wrongful Acts”
Two Lawsuits Based on Real Estate Broker’s Dual Representation of Buyers and Sellers in Same Transaction Arise from Same Wrongful Act
Coverage Barred Because Causally Related Claims Deemed a Single Claim Under Earlier Policy
Non-Covered Pre-Policy Claims for Return of Fees Do Not Impact Coverage for Breach of Duty Claim During Policy Period
Fourth Circuit Affirms that All Claims Arising from Negligent Design of Two, Nearly Identical Bridges Constitute “Related Claims”
Two Class Action Lawsuits Are “Related,” Despite Different Plaintiffs and Different Time Periods
Securities Suits Alleging Misstatements About Financial Performance Over Same Time Period Constitute A Single Claim
Ten Lawsuits Alleging Mishandling or Sale of Human Body Parts Constitute a Single “Claim”
No Coverage for Lawsuit Where SEC Notices Issued Prior to Policy Period Alleged Related Investment Misconduct
Prior and Pending Litigation Exclusion Does Not Apply Where Insurer Cannot Establish Facts Alleged in Later Investigation Were “Underlying” Prior Investigation
Wells Notices and Subsequent Enforcement Action Deemed First Made at the Time when SEC Original Investigation Began
Specific Litigation Exclusion Bars Coverage for Separate Proceeding Involving Same Conduct in Allegedly Oversupplying “Pill Mills”
Multiple Claims Arising from Employee’s Termination Deemed Related
Four Claims Regarding Same Appraisal Methodology Are Covered but Related and Therefore Confined to One Policy Year
Amended Complaint Raising Different Legal Theory Is Not a Claim First Made at Time of Initial Complaint
All Claims Arising from Negligent Design of Two, Nearly Identical Bridges Constitute “Related Claims”
Specific Litigation Exclusion Bars Coverage for Puerto Rico Mutual Fund Suits and Arbitrations
Insured’s Claims Barred by Res Judicata
No Coverage For Claims Interrelated with Prior Improperly-Noticed Claim
Eleventh Circuit Affirms that Eleven Claims Arising Out Of Negligently Repackaging Two Drugs Are “Related Claims”
Specific Litigation Exclusion Bars Coverage When Claim Arises “At Least in Part” From Excluded Litigation
Separate Lawsuits Part of a Single Claim First Made Prior to Policy Period
Insurer Not Estopped from Asserting Policy Defenses Where Insured Had Duty to Defend; Insured-v.-Insured Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Claims by Former Shareholders
Insured’s Failure to Provide Notice of Demand Letter Precludes Coverage for Related Lawsuit Noticed in Subsequent Policy Period
Court Finds Late Notice of Claim Prejudiced Insurer
Prior Acts Exclusion Bars Coverage for Suits Alleging Wrongful Conduct Spanning Prior Acts Date
Eleven Claims Arising Out of Negligently Repackaging Two Drugs Are “Related Claims”
Claims Not Related When Prior Demands Would Not Have Been Covered
Multiple Clients’ Claims Against Accountant Deemed Related and Subject to Lower Limit of Liability Due to Insureds’ Prior Knowledge of One Client’s Claim
Court Finds EEOC Charge and Subsequent Lawsuit to Be Two Separate Claims Under Claims-Made Policy
Eleventh Circuit Finds Claims to be Related Even Though They Are Based on Different Legal Theories
No Coverage for Claims Arising Out of Attorney’s Theft of Client Funds Before Policy Period
One Lawsuit Equals One Claim, Regardless of the Number of Causes of Action
Fact Issues Regarding “Relatedness of Claims” Preclude Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
No Coverage for Claim Related to Lawsuit Filed Prior to Policy’s Inception
Related Claims Provision Does Not Conflict with Prior and Pending Litigation Exclusion
No Coverage for Related Claims Where Insured Received Third-Party Indemnification
Coverage Barred For Hedge Fund’s Suit Against Insured Because Related to Prior Securities Class Action
Seven Civil Lawsuits Constitute a Single Claim Subject to a Single Per-Claim Limit
Environmental Claims Arose from Prior Orders and Deemed Not First Made During Relevant Policy Period
Court Dismisses Coverage Action Where Claims Were Made Before Policy Period and Barred by Prior and Pending Litigation Exclusion
Fourth Circuit Holds Two Lawsuits Involve Interrelated Wrongful Acts Constituting Single “Claim” Where Allegations Establish “Common Nexus of Fact”
Specific Litigation Exclusion Bars Coverage for Condo Owners’ Second Lawsuit against Condo Association
Second Circuit Rejects Use of “Factual Nexus” Test for Related Claims Analysis
Action by Tennessee Attorney General Deemed to Pre-Date Claims-Made Policy Period Because Related to Earlier-Filed Customer Complaints
Insurer’s Suit for Declaration that Multiple Claims Constitute a Single Claim Must Await Resolution of Insured’s Liability
Coverage for DOJ Investigation Not Barred Because No Way to Determine Whether There Was Substantial Overlap with Earlier Lawsuits
Motion to Dismiss Record Insufficient to Make “Related Claims” Determination
Court Holds Shareholder Litigation and Adversary Proceeding Arising From Same Merger Are Separate Claims
Bad Faith Claim Fails Absent Breach of Contract or Failure to Settle
Related Acts of Malpractice Give Rise to One Claim; Coverage Precluded by Prior Knowledge Exclusion
Insurer Owes No Duty to Defend “Related Claim” Where Suit is Based on Same Course of Discriminatory Conduct Alleged in Prior Litigation
Criminal Indictment Constitutes Related Claim to Letter from State Attorney General
Two Lawsuits Involve “Interrelated Wrongful Acts” Where They Allege a Common, Continuing Scheme by the Insured
Five Lawsuits Constitute Related Claims to Complaint First Made Before Policy Period
Prior Litigation Exclusion Bars Coverage Despite Differences in Parties and Damages Sought
Timely Notice of Initial Claim Excuses Untimely Notice of Subsequent Related Claims
Single Complaint Triggers Two Policy Periods
Prior Acts Exclusion and Insolvency Exclusion Bar Coverage for Claim Against Broker
A Civil Contempt Proceeding Is Part of the Same “Claim” as the Underlying Civil Action from Which It Arises
Allegations of General Misconduct by CEO Do Not Arise from Same “Interrelated Wrongful Acts” as Specific Allegations of Fraud
Class Action Suit Against Insured Mortgage Broker Deemed First Made at Time of Prior Suit Alleging Common Course of Conduct
Lawsuit by Four Siblings Constitutes a Single Claim Because It Alleged Interrelated Wrongful Acts
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy, Terms & Conditions, and Cookies Policy.

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.