Posts tagged Notice of Claim (Timeliness).
Summary Judgment Denied Where Determinations of Fact Necessary to Apply Continuous Cover and Innocent Non-Disclosure Provisions
Summary Judgment Denied Where Determinations of Fact Necessary to Apply Continuous Cover and Innocent Non-Disclosure Provisions
Prior Knowledge Exclusion Bars Coverage Because Failure to Comply With Statute of Limitations Could Reasonably Be Expected to Be the Basis of a Claim
Prior Knowledge Exclusion Bars Coverage Because Failure to Comply With Statute of Limitations Could Reasonably Be Expected to Be the Basis of a Claim
University’s Late-Noticed Claim Not Covered Under Claims-Made-And-Reported Policy; Notoriety of Claim Not an Excuse
University’s Late-Noticed Claim Not Covered Under Claims-Made-And-Reported Policy; Notoriety of Claim Not an Excuse
New Jersey Appellate Court Holds No Coverage for Broker Malpractice Lawsuit Noticed Three Years After It Was Filed
New Jersey Appellate Court Holds No Coverage for Broker Malpractice Lawsuit Noticed Three Years After It Was Filed
Court Requires Insurer Show Prejudice for Coverage Denial Where Notice of Claim Given After Reporting Window but Within Policy Period
Court Requires Insurer Show Prejudice for Coverage Denial Where Notice of Claim Given After Reporting Window but Within Policy Period
Third Circuit Holds No Showing of Prejudice Required Under Delaware Law to Enforce Late Notice Provision in Claims-Made Policy
Third Circuit Holds No Showing of Prejudice Required Under Delaware Law to Enforce Late Notice Provision in Claims-Made Policy
Renewal Correspondence to Underwriter Fails to Satisfy Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy’s Notice Requirement 
Renewal Correspondence to Underwriter Fails to Satisfy Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy’s Notice Requirement 
Insured’s False “Expression of Personal Belief or Opinion” Insufficient to Warrant Rescission of Policy 
Insured’s False “Expression of Personal Belief or Opinion” Insufficient to Warrant Rescission of Policy 
Montana Federal Court Holds that Notice-Prejudice Rule Does Not Apply to Claims-Made Policy
Montana Federal Court Holds that Notice-Prejudice Rule Does Not Apply to Claims-Made Policy
Innocent Insured Provision Applies Where Insured Failed to Comply with Policy’s Reporting Provision  
Innocent Insured Provision Applies Where Insured Failed to Comply with Policy’s Reporting Provision  
Replacement Professional Liability Policy Sufficiently “Similar” to Original Policy to Prevent Application of Extended Reporting Period
New Jersey High Court Holds Prejudice Not Required Under Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy
No Prejudice Necessary to Deny Coverage for an Insured’s Late Notice under Consecutive Claims-Made-and-Reported Policies
Pennsylvania Notice-Prejudice Rule Does Not Apply to Claims-Made Policies
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy, Terms & Conditions, and Cookies Policy.

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.