Posts tagged Illinois.
Common-Law Claims Associated with Unsolicited Faxes Held to be “Arising Out of” Violation of the TCPA
Common-Law Claims Associated with Unsolicited Faxes Held to be “Arising Out of” Violation of the TCPA
Multiple Lawsuits Arising Out of Employee’s Alleged Sexual Abuse of Multiple Children are “Single Claim” Under Claims-Made Policy
Multiple Lawsuits Arising Out of Employee’s Alleged Sexual Abuse of Multiple Children are “Single Claim” Under Claims-Made Policy
Insurer Has Duty to Defend Suits Seeking Only Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
Insurer Has Duty to Defend Suits Seeking Only Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
No Coverage for Lawsuit Alleging Intentional Conduct to Circumvent Estate Plan
No Coverage for Lawsuit Alleging Intentional Conduct to Circumvent Estate Plan
Insurer Had No Duty to Defend or Indemnify for Lawsuit Refiled During the Policy Period
Insurer Had No Duty to Defend or Indemnify for Lawsuit Refiled During the Policy Period
Illinois Court Holds Fee Dispute Does Not Involve Professional Services
Illinois Court Holds Fee Dispute Does Not Involve Professional Services
Question of Fact When “Claim” “First Made” Where Insured Allegedly Did Not Become Aware of Claim Until After Policy Period
Question of Fact When “Claim” “First Made” Where Insured Allegedly Did Not Become Aware of Claim Until After Policy Period
“Written Demand” Made Within a “Civil Proceeding” is Not a New Claim
“Written Demand” Made Within a “Civil Proceeding” is Not a New Claim
Illinois Court of Appeals Rules Insurer Did Not Act in Bad Faith in Denying Coverage Where Claim Was Made Before Policy Period
Illinois Court of Appeals Rules Insurer Did Not Act in Bad Faith in Denying Coverage Where Claim Was Made Before Policy Period
No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Lawsuit Overlapping With Prior EEOC Charge
No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Lawsuit Overlapping With Prior EEOC Charge
Untimely Notice of Server Outage and Related Client Communications Bars Coverage for Claim Filed against Technology Service Provider
Untimely Notice of Server Outage and Related Client Communications Bars Coverage for Claim Filed against Technology Service Provider
Declaratory Judgment Complaint Constitutes a Reportable Claim for a Wrongful Act; Subsequent Amended Complaint Adding Insured Defendants Not a Separate Claim
Declaratory Judgment Complaint Constitutes a Reportable Claim for a Wrongful Act; Subsequent Amended Complaint Adding Insured Defendants Not a Separate Claim
Insurer Has No Duty to Defend Insured in “Defensive” Arbitration Proceeding
Insurer Has No Duty to Defend Insured in “Defensive” Arbitration Proceeding
Insurer Must Defend Legal Malpractice Claim for Damages in the Amount of Fees Paid, Despite Carve Out of “Legal Fees” from Definition of “Damages”
Insurer Must Defend Legal Malpractice Claim for Damages in the Amount of Fees Paid, Despite Carve Out of “Legal Fees” from Definition of “Damages”
Obligation to Timely Report Claim Applies Even if Claim Appears to Have Been Abandoned
Obligation to Timely Report Claim Applies Even if Claim Appears to Have Been Abandoned
Ill. Ruling Clarifies Wrongful Incarceration Insurance Triggers
Ill. Ruling Clarifies Wrongful Incarceration Insurance Triggers
Exclusion for Violation of Consumer Protection Laws Does Not Bar Coverage for Alleged Violation of Landlord-Tenant Law
Exclusion for Violation of Consumer Protection Laws Does Not Bar Coverage for Alleged Violation of Landlord-Tenant Law
Coverage for Lawsuit Against School District Involving Student’s Acts of Sexual Misconduct Not Barred by Sexual Misconduct Exclusion
Coverage for Lawsuit Against School District Involving Student’s Acts of Sexual Misconduct Not Barred by Sexual Misconduct Exclusion
Availability of Information Regarding Ongoing Lawsuit Does Not Preclude Exclusions for Prior Acts or Pending Litigation
Illinois Court Holds Insured is Entitled to Independent Counsel to Defend Uncovered Punitive Damages Claim
Excess Carrier Not Entitled to Compel Production of Insured’s Settlement Agreement with Underlying Carriers
Ten Lawsuits Alleging Mishandling or Sale of Human Body Parts Constitute a Single “Claim”
Resident’s Three Claims Against Condo Association Spanning Multiple Years Deemed Single Claim Subject to Single Limit
No Duty to Defend Under Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy Where Notice of Claim Given Nine Months After Cancellation
Intentional Acts Exclusion Precludes Duty to Defend Complaint Alleging Willful Conduct
Court Holds that Government-Issued Subpoena Constitutes a Claim
Multiple Claims Arising from Employee’s Termination Deemed Related
Two Exclusions Bar Coverage under Cyber Policy for TCPA Claim
Insurer May Not Rescind Renewal Policy Based on Misrepresentations in Prior Policy’s Application
No E&O Coverage Where Insured Failed to Report Claim During Policy Period When It Was First Made
Insurer Not Estopped from Asserting Policy Defenses Where Insured Had Duty to Defend; Insured-v.-Insured Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Claims by Former Shareholders
Failure to Defend and Bring Timely Coverage Action Precludes Insurer from Raising Policy Defenses Under Illinois Law
Explicit Allegation of Acts Arising from Professional Services Required to Trigger E&O Policy
Underlying Insurer’s Agreement to Pay Limits Does Not Trigger Exhaustion for Excess Policy Requiring “Actual Payment”
Insurer Entitled to Rescind Lawyers Professional Liability Policy Where Insured Made Material Misrepresentations in Application
Insurer Has No Duty to Defend Claim Seeking Restitution and Other Unspecified Relief
Court Finds EEOC Charge and Subsequent Lawsuit to Be Two Separate Claims Under Claims-Made Policy
Certain Extrinsic Evidence Permissible for Purposes of Establishing No Duty to Defend Under Illinois Law
Lawyer’s Material Misrepresentations in Policy Renewal Applications Justify Rescission
Attorney’s Reporting of Alleged Ethics Violations Not “Professional Services”; Eight-Month Delay in Providing Notice Precludes Coverage as a Matter of Law
Federal Appellate Court Declares “Language of the Policy is King” in Affirming Application of Contract Exclusion
Due to Lack of Notice, E&O Carrier Has No Duty to Indemnify Insured Auto Insurer’s Settlement Payment Stemming from Bad Faith Claim
Legal Fees Exclusion Bars Coverage for Arbitration Award that “In Substance” Reduced Fees Owed to Insured Law Firm
Seventh Circuit Holds Insured’s Material Misrepresentations in Application Warrant Rescission of Policy
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy, Terms & Conditions, and Cookies Policy.