Posts tagged Excess insurance/exhaustion.
Prior or Pending Litigation Exclusions Bar Coverage for Contempt Motion Filed in Civil Action Commenced Before Prior or Pending Dates
Prior or Pending Litigation Exclusions Bar Coverage for Contempt Motion Filed in Civil Action Commenced Before Prior or Pending Dates
Despite Acceptance of Coverage by Primary Insurer, Excess Policy Bars Coverage for Claim Deemed Related Back to Prior Policy Period
Despite Acceptance of Coverage by Primary Insurer, Excess Policy Bars Coverage for Claim Deemed Related Back to Prior Policy Period
Excess Insurer Cannot Challenge Payments by Underlying Carriers
Excess Insurer Cannot Challenge Payments by Underlying Carriers
Court Declines to Dismiss Coverage Litigation Based on Potential Applicability of Prior Notice Exclusion
Court Declines to Dismiss Coverage Litigation Based on Potential Applicability of Prior Notice Exclusion
Failure to Plead Compliance with Condition Precedent Held Fatal to Declaratory Judgment Action
Failure to Plead Compliance with Condition Precedent Held Fatal to Declaratory Judgment Action
Insured Barred From Settling Without Insurer’s Consent Absent Breach of Duty to Defend But Insurer Must Exercise Good Faith in Settlement Negotiations
Insured Barred From Settling Without Insurer’s Consent Absent Breach of Duty to Defend But Insurer Must Exercise Good Faith in Settlement Negotiations
Excess “Other Insurance” Provision Does Not Relieve Insurer’s Duty to Defend
Excess “Other Insurance” Provision Does Not Relieve Insurer’s Duty to Defend
Written Consent Must be in Writing: Insured Breaches Consent Requirement and Loses Coverage
Written Consent Must be in Writing: Insured Breaches Consent Requirement and Loses Coverage
Excess Carrier Not Entitled to Compel Production of Insured’s Settlement Agreement with Underlying Carriers
Excess Insurer Not Bound by Primary Insurer’s Payment of Uninsurable Disgorgement Settlement
Ninth Circuit Holds Excess Policy Unambiguously Required Exhaustion of Underlying Limits by Insurers Under Either New York or California Law
Insurer’s Allegations that Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Are Not Covered Loss Survive Motion to Dismiss
Underlying Insurer’s Agreement to Pay Limits Does Not Trigger Exhaustion for Excess Policy Requiring “Actual Payment”
Excess Insurer’s Unambiguous Consent-to-Settlement Provision Bars Coverage
No Extrinsic Evidence Allowed Where Policy Language is Unambiguous
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy, Terms & Conditions, and Cookies Policy.

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.