Posts tagged Defense Costs.
Second Circuit Affirms Ruling That Excess D&O Insurer Is Not Required to Advance Defense Costs
Second Circuit Affirms Ruling That Excess D&O Insurer Is Not Required to Advance Defense Costs
No Coverage for Lawsuit Where “Claim” First Made at Time of Tolling Agreement
No Coverage for Lawsuit Where “Claim” First Made at Time of Tolling Agreement
Massachusetts Federal Court Holds Defense Costs Must Be Reasonably Allocated Between Insured and Non-Insured Parties
Massachusetts Federal Court Holds Defense Costs Must Be Reasonably Allocated Between Insured and Non-Insured Parties
Delaware Law Applies to Coverage Dispute over Stockholder Appraisal Action
Delaware Law Applies to Coverage Dispute over Stockholder Appraisal Action
Insurer Entitled to Recoup Defense Costs Absent Express Policy Provision
Insurer Entitled to Recoup Defense Costs Absent Express Policy Provision
New Jersey Appellate Court Holds No Coverage for Broker Malpractice Lawsuit Noticed Three Years After It Was Filed
New Jersey Appellate Court Holds No Coverage for Broker Malpractice Lawsuit Noticed Three Years After It Was Filed
Irreconcilable “Other Insurance” Clauses Result in Pro Rata Allocation of Defense Costs
Irreconcilable “Other Insurance” Clauses Result in Pro Rata Allocation of Defense Costs
Defense Costs Presumed Reasonable if Insurer Breaches Duty to Defend
Defense Costs Presumed Reasonable if Insurer Breaches Duty to Defend
Failure to Plead Compliance with Condition Precedent Held Fatal to Declaratory Judgment Action
Failure to Plead Compliance with Condition Precedent Held Fatal to Declaratory Judgment Action
Lawyers Professional Liability Policy Does Not Cover Non-Insured Construction Management Company; Insurer Justified in Requesting Segregated Invoices
Lawyers Professional Liability Policy Does Not Cover Non-Insured Construction Management Company; Insurer Justified in Requesting Segregated Invoices
Policy Requires Allocation of Defense Costs Based Upon Parties’ Relative Legal Exposure
Policy Requires Allocation of Defense Costs Based Upon Parties’ Relative Legal Exposure
E&O Insurer Has No Duty to Defend Dispute Limited to Recovery of Fees
E&O Insurer Has No Duty to Defend Dispute Limited to Recovery of Fees
Written Consent Must be in Writing: Insured Breaches Consent Requirement and Loses Coverage
Written Consent Must be in Writing: Insured Breaches Consent Requirement and Loses Coverage
No Allocation for Defense Costs Incurred in Lawsuit Comprised of Covered and Uncovered “Claims”
No Allocation for Defense Costs Incurred in Lawsuit Comprised of Covered and Uncovered “Claims”
Former Of Counsel Is Still “Insured Person” After Leaving Law Firm
Defense Cost Recoupment Provisions Enforceable Under Washington Law
Contract Exclusion Bars Coverage for Demand for Cost-Overrun Payment
No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Due to Securities Exclusion, Consumer Protection Law Exclusion, and Investment Performance Exclusion, but Insurer Cannot Recoup Defense Costs
Fact Disputes Preclude Summary Judgment Over Insurer’s Failure to Provide Immediate Defense
Court Finds Insurer Entitled to Recoupment, Declines to Follow ALI Restatement on the Law of Liability Insurance
Insureds Entitled to Advancement of Defense Costs But Not Equitable Reallocation of Policy Proceeds
Insured’s Non-Covered Counterclaim Does Not Create Conflict Entitling It to Select Independent Counsel
Contract Exclusion Bars Coverage for Claims Arising from Asset Purchase Agreement’s Non-Compete Clause
Insurer Has No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Insured for Action Alleging Solely Intentional Wrongdoing
Insurer’s Duty to Defend Ends at Tender of Policy Limits
Duty to Defend Does Not Extend to Prosecution of Affirmative Counterclaims
Court Upholds Eroding Defense Expense Provision; ERISA Exclusion Bars Coverage for Constitutional and Statutory Civil Rights Claims
Florida Statute Does Not Estop Insurer from Denying Reimbursement of Pre-Tender Defense Costs
Settlement of Class Actions for Allegedly Withheld Profits Not Disgorgement
Suit for Reimbursement of Beauty School Expenses Under California Labor Law Triggers Duty to Defend Despite Wage and Hour Exclusion
Certain Extrinsic Evidence Permissible for Purposes of Establishing No Duty to Defend Under Illinois Law
Insured Required to Reimburse Defense Costs Paid by Insurer for Non-Covered Claim
Seven-Month Delay Constitutes Late Notice as a Matter of Law
Insurer Did Not Breach Duty to Defend Where it Refused to Defend Insured’s Husband and Marital Community
Alaskan Law Prohibits Recoupment of Non-covered Defense Costs
Insurer May Allocate Defense Costs Under Duty to Defend Policy
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.