By Anna Schaffner on Posted in Bad Faith,Breach of ContractThe United States District Court for the District of Nevada, applying Nevada law, has held that the court’s prior favorable coverage determination was evidence that an insurer did not act in bad faith when refusing to defend or provide coverage under a policy. My Left Foot Children’s Therapy, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London,… Continue Reading
By Emily S. Hart on Posted in Breach of Contract,Defense Costs,Wrongful ActThe United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, applying California law, has held that no coverage is available for a demand for payment in excess of agreed purchase orders based on an exclusion barring coverage for loss “as a result of” a claim “for any actual or alleged obligation under . .… Continue Reading
By Margaret Thomas on Posted in Breach of Contract,Wrongful ActThe U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, applying California law, has held that neither fiduciary nor employment benefits liability coverage applied to claims seeking benefits under an insured company’s employee benefits plan because the company’s liability arose, not from negligent acts or breaches of fiduciary duty, but from its contractual obligation to… Continue Reading
By Margaret Thomas on Posted in Breach of ContractApplying North Dakota law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has held that an insurance policy issued to a parent company and several of its commonly owned affiliates did not provide coverage for a lawsuit against the owner of the companies and one of the insured subsidiaries for breach of a… Continue Reading
By Bonnie Thompson on Posted in Breach of ContractA Texas federal district court, applying Texas law, has held that a contract exclusion in an errors and omissions policy precluded coverage for a suit alleging that the insured breached a contract and committed related misconduct in connection with a contract for providing health management services to a client. Conifer Health Solutions, LLC v. QBE… Continue Reading
By Danielle Barondess on Posted in Breach of ContractApplying Wisconsin law, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin has held that a contract exclusion in a multi-line liability policy barred coverage for an action solely alleging breach of contract. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co. v. GHD Inc., 2018 WL 3304631 (E.D. Wisc. Jul. 5, 2018). The court also… Continue Reading
By Danielle Barondess on Posted in Breach of Contract,Defense Costs,Wrongful ActApplying North Dakota law, a federal district court has held that a contract exclusion contained in a directors and officers liability policy precludes coverage for claims arising from a non-compete clause in an asset purchase agreement. Mau v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., 2017 WL 4479731 (D.N.D. Oct. 3, 2017). The court also held that… Continue Reading
By Leland H. Jones, IV on Posted in Breach of Contract,LossIn a win for a Wiley Rein client, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, applying New Jersey law, held that no coverage was available under an errors and omissions policy for remediation work performed by an insured because the insured was not “legally obligated to pay” for the remediation. Wyndham… Continue Reading
By Jason O'Brien on Posted in “Claim”,Breach of ContractA federal trial court, applying California law, has held that coverage for three underlying lawsuits is not barred by a contract exclusion in a professional liability policy because applying the exclusion to any claim involving a contract would render the coverage illusory. Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co. v. 23andMe, Inc., 2016 WL 3951660 (N.D. Cal. July 22, 2016). According… Continue Reading
By Bonnie Thompson on Posted in Breach of Contract,Professional ServicesA New Jersey intermediate court of appeals has vacated and remanded a case in which the trial court held that an insurer had no duty to defend based on a breach of contract exclusion, because the appellate court could not determine whether the exclusion applied without a choice of law analysis. Pharmacy & Healthcare Commc’ns,… Continue Reading
By Margaret Thomas on Posted in “Claim”,Breach of Contract,Defense Costs,Professional ServicesThe United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that neither a breach of contract exclusion nor the implied willful acts exclusion provided for by California Insurance Code § 533 precluded an insurer’s duty to defend a lawsuit brought against its insured by one of its competitors for… Continue Reading
