Alleged Willful Conduct Enough to Bar Coverage Under California Insurance Code Section 533
Alleged Willful Conduct Enough to Bar Coverage Under California Insurance Code Section 533
Coverage Conditioned on Unambiguous Notice Requirements not Subject to Notice-Prejudice Rule
Coverage Conditioned on Unambiguous Notice Requirements not Subject to Notice-Prejudice Rule
Seventh Circuit Affirms that “Inadequate Consideration” Provision Bars Coverage for Securities Fraud Settlements
Seventh Circuit Affirms that “Inadequate Consideration” Provision Bars Coverage for Securities Fraud Settlements
First Circuit Holds UBS Puerto Rico Bond Claims Barred by Specific Litigation Exclusion
U.S. Supreme Court: ERISA “Church Plan” Exception Applies to Any Benefit Plan Maintained by Certain Church-Associated Organizations
Bank Settlements Returning Overdraft Fees—Including Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fee Awards—Are Not “Damages”
New Jersey High Court Retroactively Applies Rescission of Medical Malpractice Policy
Attorney Cannot Wait on Outcome of Appeal to Report Dismissal of Client’s Claim Due to Malpractice
Even Without Express Demand for Money, Pre-Policy Period Letter is a “Claim”
Professional Services Exclusions Bar Coverage for Failure to Give Prescribed Drugs to Prisoner
Spreadsheet Listing Asserted Damages is a “Claim”
Equitable Subrogation Allows Excess Insurer to Recover Settlement Contribution from Later Insurer After Proper Policy Period Is Determined
“Regardless of Any Apparent Intent,” Excess Policy Does Not Follow Notice Condition of Primary Policy
Motion to Dismiss Record Insufficient to Make “Related Claims” Determination
Lawyer Could Only “Reasonably Expect” Claim By Former Client—Not Her Family Members
California Court Holds Claims by Separate Investors in the Same Ponzi Scheme All Barred by Application Exclusion
Delaware Trial Court: “Final Adjudication” Exclusion Trumps “No Loss” Argument
Lawyer’s “Don’t Ask” Policy on Associate Misconduct Leads Court to Apply Prior Knowledge Exclusion
No Coverage for Suit Based on Unreported Demand Made in Prior Policy Period
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear “Continuing Violation” ERISA Case
SCOTUS Closes One Door but Opens Another in ERISA Stock Drop Cases
The Winners in Halliburton: Defense Counsel and Experts
Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek